Contract Management software
The contract is signed, filed, and then effectively forgotten.
The commitments in it are real — notice periods, service levels, price escalation, auto-renewal, liability caps — and they sit in a PDF nobody reads again until there is a dispute or an invoice that looks wrong. Most contract losses are not litigation. They are a renewal that happened automatically and an obligation nobody tracked.
What it replaces
- Contracts in shared storage, findable only if you know what someone named the file.
- Renewal and notice dates in a calendar, if anyone remembered to add them.
- Drafting from whichever version of the template was on the last person's laptop.
- Obligations — reports due, service levels, exclusivity — visible only to whoever negotiated the deal.
What we build
The parts that make it a system.
Scoped to what you run. A module you do not need is not a discount we withhold — it is work nobody does.
Repository and metadata
Every agreement with counterparty, value, term, jurisdiction and linked documents, searchable across the full text, with amendments and annexures attached to the parent rather than filed separately.
Clause and obligation tracking
The commercially significant terms extracted as data — notice, escalation, SLA, liability, termination — with obligations assigned to an owner and a due date so a report or a review is somebody's task rather than everybody's assumption.
Drafting, approval and signature
Approved templates and a clause library, deviation flagged for legal approval, version comparison, and e-signature with an execution record.
Renewals, expiry and audit
Alerting ahead of every notice window with enough runway to act, auto-renewal surfaced rather than silently exercised, and a complete history of who changed and approved what.
Where AI actually helps
And where it does not.
The strongest fit in this whole set. Reading a signed contract and extracting its terms is precisely what current models do well, and it is the step that has always blocked these projects — nobody wants to key in four hundred existing agreements. Clause deviation review against your standard positions is the second. Both are advisory: a person confirms every term that carries money or risk, and the source clause is always linked so the extraction can be checked.
Integrations
What it has to talk to.
A system that does not reach the ones you already run creates a second place to type things, which is the problem you started with.
- E-signature — DocuSign, Adobe Sign or an equivalent
- Cloud storage where the existing contract archive lives
- CRM and procurement, so a contract is linked to the deal or supplier it belongs to
- Accounting for contract value, invoicing schedule and escalation
The limits
What we do not do here.
Including, on several of these pages, telling you not to buy a build at all. That advice has cost us work. It has also stopped projects that would have failed in month three, which is cheaper for everyone.
- This is not legal advice and it is not a lawyer. It surfaces what a contract says; it does not tell you what it means for your position.
- Extraction is reviewed, not trusted. Any term that carries money or liability is confirmed by a person before it drives an alert or a payment.
- We do not do automated negotiation or clause generation that goes to a counterparty unread. Assistance in drafting, yes; unsupervised legal text, no.
In practice
Where this shows up.
Procurement-heavy businesses
Hundreds of supplier agreements with different renewal mechanics, where the value is entirely in not missing a notice window.
Services and SaaS providers
Customer contracts with SLAs and escalation clauses that have to be tracked against actual delivery, or the credits are discovered by the customer first.
How it runs
Fixed scope, fixed price, working software each sprint.
01
Discovery
A call, then a written read of the problem — what it costs today, what would have to be true for software to fix it, and whether we're the right people.
02
Proposal
Fixed scope, timeline and price. No open-ended discovery phase billed by the hour.
03
Build
Agile sprints with something running at the end of each one. You see progress in the product, not in a status deck.
04
Ship & support
Cloud deployment, production monitoring and a maintenance arrangement that starts before launch, not after the first incident.
Related
Systems that usually come up in the same conversation.
Most of these share data with each other. Where two are in scope we would rather build one system than two that sync.
Document Management
A document system that knows what a document is about — versioned, permissioned, retained and actually searchable.
Case Management
For work that is a case rather than a ticket — long-running, evidenced, regulated, and different every time.
Property Management
Units, tenants, leases, rent and maintenance in one system — with the money side reconciled rather than remembered.
Tell us what your Contract Management system would have to handle.
Pick a time that suits you. Tell us the problem, and we'll tell you honestly whether we're the right people to solve it.